EN | UA
EN | UA

Help Support

Back

Artificial intelligence model shows high accuracy and specificity for caries diagnosis

Dental caries Dental caries
Dental caries Dental caries

What's new?

Artificial intelligence-assisted caries detection tool shows strong potential for improving caries diagnosis in clinical settings. However, its sensitivity varies by tooth location and type of carious lesion.  

In a recent study, researchers explored the performance of a deep learning-based artificial intelligence (AI) diagnostic model for detecting dental caries (tooth decay) through intraoral images in real-term clinical settings. The study demonstrated promising results in terms of accuracy, specificity, and predictive value, while also identifying areas for potential improvement in caries detection. Overall, 191 consecutive patients visiting an endodontics clinic were included, resulting in the examination of 4,361 teeth using an intraoral camera.

The AI model used in the study incorporated MobileNet-v3 and U-net architectures, designed to scrutinize the images and detect caries. The performance was estimated based on standard metrics: overall accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). The clinical diagnosis made by endodontic specialists was employed as the reference standard for comparative assessment. In this prospective clinical study, the AI-assisted caries detection model demonstrated strong performance in several key areas:

Overall Accuracy: The AI model attained an overall diagnostic accuracy of 93.40%. This indicates that the AI tool correctly spotted caries in the majority of cases, showing its potential to assist clinicians in identifying dental decay.

  • Sensitivity: The sensitivity of the AI model was measured at 81.31% (with a 95% confidence interval of 78.22%-84.06%).
  • Specificity: The specificity was 95.65% (95% CI 94.94%-96.26%). This is an excellent result, indicating that the AI system is highly reliable in evading false positives and not misidentifying healthy teeth as decayed.
  • PPV: The PPV was found to be 77.68% (95% CI 74.49%-80.58%). This means that when the AI model identified a tooth as having caries, there was a 77.68% chance it was correct.
  • NPV: The NPV was 96.49% (95% CI 95.84%-97.04%). This indicates a high likelihood that a tooth identified as free of caries by the AI model truly did not have any decay, emphasizing the model’s ability to reliably rule out caries when its absence is predicted.

One of the key insights was the variation in diagnostic accuracy based on:

  • Tooth position: The AI model performed best in detecting caries in the anterior teeth (front teeth), with an accuracy rate of 96.04%.
  • Caries type: The model exhibited lower sensitivity for certain types of caries. For instance, interproximal caries (decay between teeth) in anterior teeth and buccal caries (decay on the outer surface) in premolars showed markedly lower sensitivity, with detection rates as low as 10%.

With high accuracy, specificity, and NPV, the AI tool can assist clinicians in identifying healthy teeth and successfully ruling out caries, thus boosting diagnostic confidence. However, the sensitivity for certain tooth positions and caries types needs improvement. Advanced AI models and multimodal data integration may boost AI-supported caries diagnosis in dental care settings.

Source:

BMC Oral Health

Article:

Diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence-assisted caries detection: a clinical evaluation

Authors:

Jing-Wen Zhang et al.

Comments (0)

You want to delete this comment? Please mention comment Invalid Text Content Text Content cannot me more than 1000 Something Went Wrong Cancel Confirm Confirm Delete Hide Replies View Replies View Replies en
Try: