EN | UA
EN | UA

Help Support

Back

Galcanezumab exhibited significant functional improvements in episodic migraine management: Double-blind placebo-controlled phase 2b trial.

Galcanezumab exhibited significant functional improvements in episodic migraine management: Double-blind placebo-controlled phase 2b trial. Galcanezumab exhibited significant functional improvements in episodic migraine management: Double-blind placebo-controlled phase 2b trial.
Galcanezumab exhibited significant functional improvements in episodic migraine management: Double-blind placebo-controlled phase 2b trial. Galcanezumab exhibited significant functional improvements in episodic migraine management: Double-blind placebo-controlled phase 2b trial.

What's new?

The placebo-controlled phase 2b trial with Galcanezumab found its clinical relevance in improving the patient-related outcomes in chronic migraine.

According to a Double‐Blind, Randomized, Placebo‐Controlled Phase 2b Trial the Galcanezumad, humanised monoclonal antibody showed significant improvements in severe migraine. The study involved the evaluation of two disease-specific patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measurement among adults at 12 weeks from the baseline. The primary goal of a migraine preventive treatment and a measurement target for PROs was the prevention of headache-related functional impairment. Identification of which drug manage a migraine headache along with improving patient functioning is essential to reduce the patient burden.

Patients received 120 mg Galcanezumab subcutaneously or placebo for 28 days up to 12 weeks. The patients who completed the 12 weeks of treatment on two PROs [HIT‐6(Headache Impact Test™) and MSQ (Migraine‐Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire)] went through post hoc secondary analyses.

Analysis of covariance exhibited considerable variations in the least square mean changes between Galcanezumab and placebo from baseline for all MSQ domains. The total mean change noticed for placebo was of 18.63 and for Galcanezumab of 27.36 (P‐value of .0067). Emotional Function mean the shift in placebo was 16.88 and Galcanezumab was 26.61 (P‐value of .0063). Role Function‐Preventive mean change noticed for placebo was 13.43 and for Galcanezumab was 19.76 (P‐value of) and the Role Function‐Restrictive mean change for placebo was 22.40 and for Galcanezumab was 31.92 (P‐value of  0.0342 and 0.0071, respectively). The MSQ total scores and HIT-6 was not associated with migraine headache days (MHDs) at the baseline. The association was noticed between MSQ and HIT‐6 scores with MHD at 12 weeks post‐treatment (all P < .0001).

As reflected by changes in MSQ scores, the treatment with Galcanezumab shows significant functional improvements as compared to placebo. The increase in MSQ and decrease in HIT-6 scores is associated with clinically important MHD changes relating to PROs. 

Source:

Headache

Article:

Measures of Functioning in Patients With Episodic Migraine: Findings From a Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Phase 2b Trial With Galcanezumab.

Authors:

David W. Ayer et al.

Comments (0)

You want to delete this comment? Please mention comment Invalid Text Content Text Content cannot me more than 1000 Something Went Wrong Cancel Confirm Confirm Delete Hide Replies View Replies View Replies en
Try: