EN | UA
EN | UA

Help Support

Back

Peroral vs. intravenous antibiotics: Which is better for post-appendectomy recovery?

Appendicitis Appendicitis
Appendicitis Appendicitis

What's new?

Administering peroral antibiotics after laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis markedly boosts patient recovery and shortens hospital stays when compared to intravenous antibiotics.

In a new sub-study from a larger cluster-randomized non-inferiority trial, peroral antibiotics offered a marked improvement in recovery and a reduction in hospitalization after laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis in comparison with intravenous antibiotics. This study, published in Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, investigated the effects of peroral and intravenous antibiotics within fast-track surgery and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols, focusing on their influence on patient-reported outcomes after surgery.

Overall, 54 participants were randomly allocated to two groups: one group received peroral antibiotics for 3 days after surgery (n=23), while the other group was treated with intravenous antibiotics (n=31). The primary outcome was the quality of recovery on day 3 after surgery, measured via the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) questionnaire. The analysis revealed several key findings:

  • Recovery Outcomes: Patients in the peroral antibiotic group reported markedly better recovery outcomes, with a mean QoR-15 score of 12 points higher than those in the intravenous group. This improvement suggests a more favorable overall recovery experience for those receiving oral antibiotics.
  • Hospital Stay: The peroral group also experienced shorter hospital stays, with an average reduction of 47 hours as opposed to the intravenous group. This shorter duration aligns with the goals of ERAS protocols, which aim to minimize hospital-related costs and boost patient satisfaction by promoting quicker recoveries and earlier discharges.
  • Readmissions and Complications: Importantly, there were no pivotal differences between the two groups in terms of readmissions or severe postoperative complications, suggesting that oral antibiotics were just as useful as intravenous treatment in preventing adverse outcomes.

Hence, peroral antibiotics are not only a viable alternative to intravenous antibiotics for appendicitis but may offer superior benefits in terms of postoperative recovery and shorter hospital stays. These findings support a potential shift in clinical practice, aligning with the principles of ERAS, which advocate for lowering the invasiveness of postoperative care and promoting faster recovery times.

Source:

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery

Article:

Postoperative recovery in peroral versus intravenous antibiotic treatment following laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis: a substudy of a cluster randomized cluster crossover non-inferiority study

Authors:

Ahmed Abdirahman Mohamud et al.

Comments (0)

You want to delete this comment? Please mention comment Invalid Text Content Text Content cannot me more than 1000 Something Went Wrong Cancel Confirm Confirm Delete Hide Replies View Replies View Replies en
Try: