Back

Difference in two different forms of Sevoflurane for anesthesia maintenance and recovery

Clinical Research 7 min 206

Font Size

Created On: 14/02/2020

Difference in two different forms of Sevoflurane for anesthesia maintenance and recovery

Sevoflurane is a commonly used inhalation anesthetic in anesthesia practice.

See All

Key take away

The original and generic form of sevoflurane were comparable in routine anesthesia practice, but there exist some differences in maintenance period of the anesthesia.

Background

Sevoflurane is a commonly used inhalation anesthetic in anesthesia practice. It is preferred over other known analgesics because its less soluble in blood, less disturbing to the respiratory tract, and also offers a smooth induction and recovery from anesthesia. Different factors can affect the inspirational, alveolar and awakening concentration of Sevoflurane. The inspirational concentration is affected by fresh gas flow rate, the volume of the breathing system and any absorption by the machine or breathing circuit. The alveolar concentration is affected by anesthetic uptake which in turn is dependent on solubility in the blood, alveolar blood flow and the partial pressure difference between alveolar gas and venous blood. The awakening concentration is defined as end-tidal concentration independent of gender, duration of anesthesia and type of surgery. Age and temperature are known to influence minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) and MAC-Awake in humans. There are two forms of Sevoflurane, one is original, and other is generic form. These two forms are therapeutically equivalent, but differ by synthesis process, formulation characteristics, water content, and conditions of storage. The differences in the water content of these forms are of great clinical importance as it results in different clinical and anesthetic effects of Sevoflurane. The original form of Sevoflurane contains 300 ppm water, while the generic form has <130-ppm water. The water acts as a stabilizer preventing acid degradation of these products, which can cause respiratory irritation if inhaled. It was pointed out in a clinical study of the pediatric population that water content of Sevoflurane affected the fractions of inspired and expired sevoflurane in the awakening period.

Rationale behind the research:

There is limited evidence comparing the two forms of sevoflurane. Therefore, this was conducted to examine the differences between two forms of sevoflurane.

Objective:

To evaluate the difference between original and generic products of sevoflurane in the time taken to reach 1 MAC level at a fixed vaporizer setting.

Method

Study outcome measures:

Study outcomes include the bispectral index (BIS), time to reach 1 MAC level, percent vaporizer concentration of sevoflurane, additional remifentanil doses, inspired and expired Sevoflurane levels
In the awakening period, decreasing times of MAC 0.5, 0.4, 0.3, BIS levels, sedation-agitation and Aldrete scores were recorded

Time Points: 2 minutes before anesthesia induction, then at 4, 6, 8, and 10 minutes after induction and subsequently every 5 minutes during anesthesia.

Result

Study Outcomes:

No considerable differences reported between the groups in demographic data, duration of anesthesia, HR, NIBP, SpO2 and EtCO2 (p>0.05)
The time to reach 1MAC level was shorter in Group Sevo ( 6.3±2.4) than in Group Sojo (8.5±5.2) {Fig 1}

Fig 1: Time to reach 1 MAC level after anesthesia induction

Inspired and expired sevoflurane fractions were observed to be higher in the original form than in the generic form
No differences were recorded in the above-explained parameters between the two groups in the awakening period and postoperatively

Conclusion

The present study reported that the time to reach 1 MAC level was shorter and that the fractions of inspired and expired sevoflurane were higher in the original product compared with the generic product. The results of the previous studies are quite the opposite to what the current research had shown. A survey by Tomal et al., studied two different forms of sevoflurane (with 300-ppm water or 260-ppm propylene glycol as a stabilizer) on a pediatric population and it was found that a significant number of children required an extra bolus of Sevoflurane to keep the same anesthesia level in the generic group. Despite the same concentration in vaporizer dial, the median fractions of inspired and expired Sevoflurane were higher and BIS levels were lower in the original Sevoflurane group than in the generic sevoflurane group.

A standardized anesthesia regimen was used in this study with effective control on depth of anesthesia by keeping a check on BIS levels. The different factors that were affecting the inspirational concentration of sevoflurane, such as fresh gas flow rate and the volume of the breathing system, and thermodynamics and respiratory parameters were similar between the two groups.

The SAS and Alderate scores were also found to be similar in both groups of sevoflurane in the awakening and recovery period. There were no significant signs of respiratory tract irritation such as coughing, laryngospasm or breath holding determined between the two groups. There was no measurement of time to eye-opening or of the fraction of inspired and expired sevoflurane after discontinuation of sevoflurane in both groups. The time to decrease MAC and BIS level from 0.5-0.3 were observed that tends to be longer in original form. The differences observed in time to reach MAC were not significant.

Limitations

Consumption of sevoflurane was not measured in the study.

Clinical take-away

The inspired and expired Sevoflurane fractions were observed to be higher and the time taken to reach 1 MAC level was shorter in the original form than in the generic form. Anesthesiologists must pay attention to these study outcomes when using different preparations of sevoflurane.