EN | UA
EN | UA

Help Support

Back

Comparative study of pulpotomy biomaterials for symptomatic irreversible pulpitis

Pulpitis Pulpitis
Pulpitis Pulpitis

While pulpectomy has long been the standard of care, its complexity and potential complications have prompted a shift toward modern, minimally invasive treatments like pulpotomy, which aim to preserve pulp vitality.

See All

Key take away

In pulpitis-affected patients, endosequence bio-ceramic root repair material offers superior pain reduction, periapical healing, and sensitivity improvement when compared to other pulpotomy agents.

Background

While pulpectomy has long been the standard of care, its complexity and potential complications have prompted a shift toward modern, minimally invasive treatments like pulpotomy, which aim to preserve pulp vitality.

This randomized controlled trial delved into the comparative efficiency of four advanced pulpotomy agents in mature permanent molars, assessing their clinical and radiographic outcomes.

Method

Overall, 80 people (aged 14–60 years) diagnosed with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis were recruited. Volunteers were randomly divided into 4 groups, each treated with one of the biomaterials: biodentine, mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), bio-C repair, and endosequence bio-ceramic root repair material (BCRRM).
 
Pulpotomy procedures were carried out, with outcomes monitored at 24 hours, 1 week, 4 weeks, and at 3, 6, and 12 months. Clinical success was marked by the absence of tenderness, sensitivity, and pain. Using periapical index scoring system, the radiographic healing was determined.

Result

The findings were striking. All groups experienced a dramatic decline in postoperative pain. Endosequence BCRRM emerged as the standout performer, delivering the most substantial pain relief at 24 hours, with prominent results at the 1% probability level, followed by bio-C repair, biodentine, and MTA. At 1 week, bio-C repair showed pain alleviation, though differences were statistically insignificant.

By 3, 6, and 12 months, all groups experienced complete pain resolution. Radiographically, endosequence BCRRM illustrated the most pronounced periapical healing at 1 year. The sensitivity to cold and hot stimuli markedly improved across all the groups, with endosequence BCRRM consistently outperforming its peers.

Conclusion

Endosequence BCRRM set a new benchmark in pulpotomy efficacy, outperforming its counterparts and underscoring the pivotal role of biomaterial choice in optimizing patient outcomes. These findings pave the way for further research to explore the long-term potential of innovative pulpotomy agents, aiming to redefine standards in minimally invasive endodontic care.

Source:

Journal of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics

Article:

Comparative evaluation of various biomaterials as pulpotomy agents in molars with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: A randomized single-blinded single-center control trial

Authors:

Vidushi Gilhotra et al.

Comments (0)

You want to delete this comment? Please mention comment Invalid Text Content Text Content cannot me more than 1000 Something Went Wrong Cancel Confirm Confirm Delete Hide Replies View Replies View Replies en
Try: